Notice: Use of undefined constant soptin_PATH - assumed 'soptin_PATH' in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-content/plugins/case-study/case-study.php on line 12

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in LayerSlider_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Tabs_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Tweets_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Flickr_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Facebook_Like_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Ad_125_125_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Social_Links_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Contact_Info_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959

Notice: The called constructor method for WP_Widget in Fusion_Recent_Works_Widget is deprecated since version 4.3.0! Use
__construct()
instead. in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3959
admin | SQAD

Notice: Undefined variable: name in /home/jasonbeckett1/public_html/wp-content/plugins/fusion-core/libs/avada-functions.php on line 143

About admin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far has created 123 blog entries.

Protected: MediaTools 5.5 – Freeform Calendar Creation

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

By |July 6th, 2018|MediaTools Update|Enter your password to view comments.

SQAD MediaCosts: Local Cable TV Data includes 210 local markets

EXPANDED LOCAL CABLE COST DATA…

With the May 2018 release in the Local Cable data set, we’ve expanded your cost transparency visibility coast-to-coast by integrating all 210 DMA’s into the research data. This broader data set allows researchers to dig into the real transactional ad costs in every market in the US for true cross-media cost planning and strategies.

UPDATED BACK ISSUES…

Additionally, for those users with access to back issues of the data, we have updated all previous data releases with the expanded market lists. With this update, your historic trend reporting and research will include all relevant markets.

Login now to start researching with the expanded data.

LOGIN NOW

EXPANDED MARKET INSIGHTS

We’ve added 57 more markets to the Local Cable database, giving you incredible transparency into all 210 DMA markets.

LINCOLN & HASTINGS-KRNY 106
SPRINGFIELD-HOLYOKE 116
YOUNGSTOWN 117
LAFAYETTE, LA 121
SANTABARBRA-SANMAR-SANLUOB 123
MONTGOMERY (SELMA) 124
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 128
ROCKFORD, IL 138
MINOT-BISMARCK-DICKINSON 141
BEAUMONT-PORT ARTHUR, TX 142
PALM SPRINGS, CA 146
ANCHORAGE, AK 147
WICHITA FALLS & LAWTON 149
ERIE, PA 150
ROCHESTR-MASON CITY-AUSTIN 153
TERRE HAUTE, IN 155
BANGOR, ME 156
GAINESVILLE 159
SHERMAN-ADA 160
BINGHAMTON, NY 161
YUMA-EL CENTRO 166
HATTIESBURG-LAUREL 168
CLARKSBURG-WESTON 169
RAPID CITY, SD 170
QUINCY-HANNIBAL-KEOKUK 172
DOTHAN, AL 173
LAKE CHARLES, LA 174
HARRISONBURG, VA 175
ALEXANDRIA, LA 178
WATERTOWN, NY 179
BOWLING GREEN, KY 181
JONESBORO, AR 182
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 183
LAREDO, TX 184
BEND, OR 186
LAFAYETTE, IN 188
LIMA, OH 189
TWIN FALLS 190
MERIDIAN, MS 191
GREAT FALLS, MT 192
GREENWOOD-GREENVILLE 193
EUREKA, CA 195
SAN ANGELO, TX 196
CHEYENNE-SCOTTSBLUF 197
CASPER-RIVERTON 198
MANKATO 199
OTTUMWA-KIRKSVILLE 200
ST. JOSEPH 201
FAIRBANKS 202
VICTORIA 203
ZANESVILLE 204
HELENA 205
PRESQUE ISLE 206
JUNEAU 207
ALPENA 208
NORTH PLATTE 209
GLENDIVE 210

To see a full list of all 210 DMA markets here.

Need access to MediaCosts: Local Cable TV data?

If you don’t already have a subscription to the Local Cable TV cost data, we’re here to help. Call 914-524-7600 opt 2 to contact your SQAD Account Executive, and we’ll get you setup with this expanded database.

By |May 30th, 2018|MediaCosts Update, Product Update|0 Comments

The Laura Ingraham Ad Boycott Is Still Going, But Fox News Isn’t Budging

By: Jeremy Barr
April 13, 2018

…SQAD, an organization that measures the cost of advertising, said that Ingraham’s show has seen previous, week-over-week drops in price throughout the first quarter of the year that make the drop between last week (when she was on vacation) and this week seem less noteworthy…

Read more at: Hollywood Reporter.

By |April 13th, 2018|In The News, News Room|0 Comments

March Madness Grows 5% In National TV Ad Dollars, Ratings Down

By: Wayne Friedman
April 3, 2018

…SQAD, the media cost and analysis researcher, says that for the NCAA championship game the average cost for a 30-second commercial simulcast on Turner’s three networks ranged between $1,427,120 and $1,712,231. This is a 3% jump from last year’s final game, which ranged between $1,387,933 and $1,660,956…

Read more at: MediaPost.

By |April 4th, 2018|In The News|0 Comments

WSJ: CMO Today – April 3rd 2018

By: Lara O’Reilly
April 3, 2018

…TBS’s ad sales team was probably celebrating, too. The average cost for a 30-second spot during the game ranged between $1.4 million and $1.7 million, a 3% jump over last year, according to media-research firm SQAD….

Read more at: Wall Street Journal.

By |April 3rd, 2018|In The News, News Room|0 Comments

5 Game Changers Every Advertiser Must Know in March 2018

SQAD POD: 5 Game Changers Every Advertiser Should Know – March 2018

Industry news and insights podcast curated from the world of advertising and marketing trends.

Spring is about to bust out all over, and soon we’ll be pulling out the picnic blankets for fun days in the park, laying on the grass and playing in the sun. But before the final snow flurries of winter are gone, we’ve got time to look at the exciting new advertising trends and industry news stories. This month we’re talking about cutbacks on primetime ads, local OTT advertising, even more media mergers, sponsored direct messages on Facebook Messenger, and advertising in the era of Time’s Up.

1. In Primetime TV Ads, ‘Less Is More’

Viewers of This Is Us (and other NBC shows) will soon start noticing their favorite primetime shows are being interrupted less frequently by commercial breaks. In an effort to bring viewers back to the couch, NBC is planning to reduce the amount of ad slots in primetime programming. Beginning in the fourth quarter, it plans on reducing the number of primetime ads by 20 percent and the amount of ad time during primetime by 10 percent. Similarly, Fox wants to reduce ad time on its channel to two minutes per hour by 2020. So this begs the question: How will the reduction impact advertisers? Along with reducing its ad spot inventory, NBC is also introducing new formats that would allow advertisers to include real-time commentary about the show (as they would do on Twitter), commercials that would play on a part of the screen while the programming is still running, and something they call a “prime pod,” which is a 60-second piece of national ad time during the first or last break of a show, featuring only two sponsors. Shortened primetime ad times and new ad formats will definitely lead advertisers to rethink their strategies.

2. Local Over-The-Top Advertising Gains Steam

One of the largest broadcasting companies in the U.S., Sinclair Broadcast Group, is making moves to drive local advertising on connected TV and over-the-top services – a strategy that has (until now) been hard to justify due to the lack of data around local viewership. However, Sinclair is ready to change your mind and give local businesses the assurances they need to buy into OTT advertising. By joining up with Tru Optik, a data company that manages ads for connected TV and measures OTT viewing, Sinclair wants to empower local advertisers with data that will prove they are getting the best bang for their buck. This move to draw in local OTT advertisers will only be amplified if its acquisition of Tribune Media is approved – a deal that will give it ownership of well over 200 local stations in the major markets, and give it a stronger foothold in a media world currently being transformed by cord cutting and OTT streaming. Can they rejuvenate the stagnant local advertising market? Perhaps targeting OTT ads to specific household demographics is just what local advertisers need to get on board. Time will tell.

3. Comcast Reaches for the Sky

Comcast has thrown their name in the ring for the acquisition of the Sky News, bidding against 21st Century Fox for the UK pay-TV giant, and they are in it to win it with an enormous $31 billion bid on the table. This is a deal that could be a game changer for Comcast, giving them the ability to expand in Europe and possibly work around tight U.S. regulations that are limiting some domestic growth. Above all, the acquisition would help expand their OTT services, which is particularly important after it lost 33,000 traditional pay-tv customers in the last quarter of 2017. While these giant mergers are changing the landscape of media and advertising, they certainly do not come without pushback – most notably from the U.S. Justice Department, which has its hawk eyes on media consolidation acquisitions. The Department is concerned mega-companies could lead to monopolies, higher prices, and less competition – which would, in turn, lead to less innovation. On one hand, it will benefit the big players at the top, and on the other, consumers will be deprived of choice. We’ll have to wait and see which side wins out.

4. Facebook Messenger or Spam Folder?

Though many consider Facebook to be a social media network, it is in fact a robust and complex advertising machine. It’s safe to assume everything it does, has (or will have) an advertising revenue model attached to it. Case in point, the company is now looking to its Messenger platform to boost revenue by allowing businesses to schedule sponsored messages to people who have already used Messenger to contact that business. The messages will be blasted and targeted to users with customized text, images, and a call-to-action button. While this personalized way of advertising makes the business-to-customer experience more intimate, many may be left with trust issues. Essentially, Facebook is creating a policy that says, “if you contact a company on Messenger you are opting in to unsolicited marketing.” While this may seem like good news for advertisers (removing the expressed consent process from communication marketing), the unintended consequences could be driving consumers out of Messenger all together, and/or cause users to think twice before communicating with a company in Messenger or on Facebook. Maybe the potential of losing Messenger users in an attempt to create paid push advertising, is an acceptable risk for Facebook… after all, they have WhatsApp sitting in the wings to take the place of Messenger if they burn their goodwill with consumers.

5. Advertising in the Era of ‘Time’s Up’

While advanced technology and format innovations often drive game changing trends in the advertising industry, sometimes cultural shifts and political sentiment can be just as disruptive to the status quo. The latest to shake things up is a group of 180 female CEOs and top agency executives, who have come together to form a group called Time’s Up Advertising, with their sights set on addressing issues related to sexual harassment and gender inequality within the industry. Their goal is to drive efforts to make the advertising environment safer and more inclusive through policies, practices, and actions. What began with 14 C-suite female players with a vision of industry transformation at the start of the year, has since become a team of 180 women-strong. The group is holding its first community meetings in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago on May 14. The tremors of the “Time’s Up” movement are being felt across all industries, and it will undeniably shake the grounds of the advertising world, too.

By |March 21st, 2018|Game Changers|0 Comments

5 Game Changers Every Advertiser Must Know in February 2018

SQAD POD: 5 Game Changers Every Advertiser Should Know – February 2018

Industry news and insights podcast curated from the world of advertising and marketing trends.

February is when the weather can’t decide to be spring or winter, and we’re all trying our best to hold tight to those New Year resolutions. Gym workouts may not be as consistent as you want and everyday feels like a “cheat day,”…but while resolutions may be faltering, game-changing trends in the advertising world are holding strong. This month, we’re talking about a possible CBS/Viacom merger, the mobile revolution of live sports, Facebook Watch versus YouTube, how brain studies could optimize advertising, and Salon becoming a mining operation.

1. On-Again, Off-Again – CBS & Viacom Are Back Together

After a well-documented breakup back in 2005, CBS and Viacom are in serious conversations to reunite once again. As media competition expands, margins tighten, and content is everywhere, mega-mergers are looking like the best chance for some companies to stay alive and relevant. The Disney/21st Century Fox, as well as AT&T/Time Warner are turning up the heat for other media companies to join forces or get left behind. The partnership of CBS and Viacom would position the new company on a strong competitive footing by consolidating the content from both companies into a unified eco-system. While the Viacom content could help CBS boost its paid subscription service CBS All Access (which is currently suffering from limited content value), it could in turn help Viacom make something of their Philo streaming service – analysts speculate that the services will merge to rival Hulu, Netflix, YouTube, and the soon-to-come Disney streaming service. An added game changer could be that CBS will have a leg up in securing the NFL broadcast and streaming rights. Big alliances like this one tend to shake things up, create more innovation in the space, and challenge the status quo. It’s worth keeping an eye on this as part of the larger trends reshaping the TV landscape as a whole.

2. Big Things for Live Sports on Small Screens

Live sports have been staple programming for traditional TV thanks to a dedicated audience chained to their couches, captive to the messages of advertisers. However, shifting viewing habits and expiring broadcasting agreements for the NFL (due in 2022) and the NBA (due in 2025) have the entire industry rethinking their strategies. With dwindling viewership numbers for traditional broadcast TV, platforms like Verizon (with its newly acquired Yahoo Sports resources) are throwing their hat in the ring for broadcast rights. Verizon is expanding their agreements with both the NBA and the NFL to boost mobile streaming access with the goal of becoming the leading source for live game viewing. The NBA deal gives Verizon an exclusive on streaming games with League Pass and the use of clips for new Yahoo NBA shows. Their deal with the NFL gives Yahoo exclusive streaming rights to games on Sunday, Monday, and Thursday nights. Sports viewing on handheld devices will allow Verizon to offer more personalized ad experiences while expanding the viewing experience – not only can they hone in on specific audience preferences, they can experiment with different forms of multimedia such as augmented reality, the timing of commercial breaks, and even different announcement crews. If Verizon can make mobile the new dominant viewing platform for live sports, we may be seeing a game changer for traditional broadcast networks.

3. Facebook Watch Is Going After YouTube’s Creators… AND Advertisers

The latest chapter in the Facebook versus Google saga is all a about video – more specifically, video advertising. Facebook has been sitting down with media agencies to discuss its plans to expand Watch with the intention to go directly after Google’s YouTube. It is also planning to implement an advertising system where creators could upload their content for free and earn a portion of the revenue from the ads placed on the video. Sounds logical, right? Facebook says they are planning to create a tiered advertising system and allow the purchase of ads on specific shows, similar to how traditional TV sells ads. Companies can pay a premium to advertise on top performing shows, which they hope will also weed out of lower quality shows – a problem that plagues YouTube advertisers. Facebook has their sights set firmly on YouTube and is addressing many of the concerns advertisers have related to content and quality standards. We’ll have to see if Facebook has what it takes to unseat the streaming king.

4. Understanding the Brain to Optimize Advertising

The brain is complex and mysterious, dictating everything about how we perceive our reality and ourselves. Understanding how the brain works means understanding how to make ads that truly resonate with (read: manipulate) consumers, right? For instance, after a recent study, neuroscientists found that ads shown in a premium editorial environment were viewed 17% longer, with 29% higher engagements than ads shown on social media platforms. While ads on social media could capture people’s attention, they were less likely to make a long-term brand impact or drive engagement. The take away – not only does it matter who you target, but where you target your consumers. Diving deeper into brain studies could be a game changer for the way how, where, and why we advertise.

5. Put On Your Mining Hat to Read Salon.com

For some quick background, mining cryptocurrencies entails two main functions: releasing new currency and recording actions into the blockchain, which is a shared public ledger of every single transaction and the ownership of every cryptocurrency in circulation. It’s a process that requires a special program and massive computing power, and news company Salon has found a unique way to use crypto-mining as a way to regain lost revenue from adblockers. When a visitor visits the Salon website while running an adblocking they are met with a popup, giving them to option to either disable their adblocker (allowing traditional revenue generation through ad impressions) or have their ads suppressed in exchange for hijacking their computing power to mine cryptocurrency while on the site. The core of this business model is simple: in exchange for an ad-free experience on Salon.com users are giving the publisher their computing power. Salon’s chief executive Jordan Hoffner asserts, “The way the media business is going, it needs new path. I think we are the first to actually make it as [part] of the business model in publishing.” This is an interesting turn of events for ads, blockers, and revenue generation. Let’s see if this model catches on.

By |February 27th, 2018|Game Changers|0 Comments

On Disruption And Destabilization In TV

By: Randy Cooke
February 13, 2018

…An advertiser, for example, could option a broadcast network ad in a specific program for a $20 demo CPM or target the same demo in the same program only in Los Angeles for a $200 CPM. Demographic values vary greatly across Nielsen’s 210 designated market areas (DMAs), with SQAD high-average prime CPMs for adults 18-49 in 1Q topping $1,500 in Glendive, Mont., Nielsen’s smallest DMA…

Read more at: AdExchanger

By |February 14th, 2018|In The News|0 Comments

Prices for Olympic Games Spots Mixed, Says SQAD

By: Jon Lafayette
February 9, 2018

…For all of primetime, NBC is getting between $538,499 and $650,241 per 30 second spot, down1.8% from what it got for the Sochi games, according to SQAD.

On Thursday night (Feb. 8), the first day of competition in PyeongChang, overnight household ratings were down 6% from the same evening of competition in Sochi.

The price for weekday primetime spots is up 2.2% to $561,421-$676,553 from $552,316 to $558,904….

Read more at: Broadcasting & Cable

By |February 12th, 2018|In The News|0 Comments

DATA REPORT: PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics

As we step into the arena of the PyeongChang Olympics, our SQAD Data Team started to dig into our MediaCost: National advertising cost data to see if there are any noteworthy trends for this year’s Games. We’ve made some interesting discoveries you might find interesting.

OPENING CEREMONIES

The average unit cost for a :30 ad during the 2018 opening ceremony averages between $544,865 and $665,946 – down 3% from the 2014 Sochi Games.

WEEK 1 -vs- WEEK 2

During the PyeongChang Games, CPMs (Cost Per Thousand) for Women aged 25-54 are seeing a 25% week-over-week decline, averaging between $152.22 and $179.06 in Week 2.

ALL PRIME

Compared to the 2014 Games, Primetime Household CPMs for the PyeongCheong Games are up 30%, averaging $49.78 – $60.72.

Primetime CPMs for Men 25-54 during the PyeongChang Games fell nearly 15% from 2014, averaging $94.46 – $115.45.

2018 Primetime CPMs for Women 25-54 rose nearly 130% compared to 2014, averaging $189.08 – $228.78.

Targeting Women 25-54 during Primetime for the PyeongChang Games costs twice as much (averaging $189.08 – $228.78) than targeting Men 25-54.

WEEKDAY PRIME

Weekday Primetime CPMs for Adults 25-54 for the PyeongChang Games are up 40% from the Sochi Games, averaging between $75.73 and $91.25.

Weekday Primetime CPMs for Women 25-54 during for the PyeongChang Games nearly doubled from the Sochi Games, averaging between $189.26 and $230.38.

WEEKEND PRIME

The cost of targeting Adults 25-54 during Weekend Primetime for the PyeongChang Games is up 12% from the 2014 Games, with average CPMs of $85.88 – $101.42.

Targeting Women 25-54 costs 75% more (CPMs averaging $193.98 – $232.36) than targeting Men 25-54 during the Weekend Primetime viewing of the PyeongChang Games.

WEEKDAY PRIME -vs- WEEKEND PRIME

During the PyeongChang Games, average Primetime ad costs on Weekdays are 3.5% higher than on Weekends.

Targeting male viewers 25-54 on Weekdays during the PyeongChang Games costs 20% more (CPMs averaging $139.04 – $165.54) than on the Weekends.

Weekday CPMs for Household CPMs during the PyeongChang Games average between $52.49 and $62.63, over 11% higher than Weekends CPMs.

WEEKEND AFTERNOON

Running a :30 ad on a Weekend Afternoon of the PyeongChang Games costs 17% more (averaging between $422,689 and $505,278) than for the 2014 Sochi Games.

During the 2014 Sochi Games, ad costs on Saturday were 33% higher than Sunday; but, the PyeongChang Games average around the same price for both days.

By |February 9th, 2018|SQAD Data Reports|0 Comments